Big Bully

Pokhara , where we lived and worked for 4 happy years

The Nepal blockade is unbelievable. Contrary to all international laws, India is blockading a small landlocked country in an attempt to bring it to its knees . One would understand if the Hindutwits who run the Indian government thought that they were striking a blow against Islam.( as those idiots who are abusing people like Dr Bhargava think). Nepal is even more Hindu than India. The country has always been the only one in the world that lets us visit and work there with no questions asked. Some of us have had the privilege of doing so and many of us remember those times as the happiest and most relaxed times we have ever spent among some of the most friendly people on earth.
It is time to speak out about this. It is totally unacceptable that India should treat Nepal in this manner. No matter what the provocation, this MUST STOP.
I am reproducing an article written by Kunda Dixit in Nepal Times which may give a flavour of what is at stake .Kunda Dixit is one of Nepal's leading media personalities. He is well known for his commitment to the free press and is part of Himal, one of South Asia's best magazines.

Flag-waving

Tuesday, November 3rd , 2015

By Kunda Dixit (published in Nepal Times)

Sooner or later (the sooner the better) this blockade will come to an end. It must. It is unnatural, illegal, destabilising and detrimental to the long-term national interests of both countries.

Once the border is open again, we will have to start counting the cost. Nepal will have lost hugely in monetary terms – already the economic damage to the country of the two-month long blockade far exceeds the impact of the earthquake that affected 12 districts in April. Nepal’s already-shaky economy will take years, to recover from the cumulative destruction of the earthquake and the blockade. Nepal’s growth forecasts for the coming years will have to be revised downwards. Development has been pushed back.

Of more immediate humanitarian concern is the effect that the blockade is having on the delivery of relief and construction material to nearly 2 million survivors of the earthquake so they can rebuild before a harsh Himalayan winter. This is an unfolding and ongoing disaster, and unlike the earthquake is completely man made.

Yet, parachutist journalists from the international media who were so quick to descend on Kathmandu in April are nowhere to be seen. This time, there aren’t any visuals of pancaked temples, of bodies crushed under concrete beams, of babies rescued alive after 24 hours being buried under the rubble. A blockade, what lead to it, and what it is doing to us, is too complicated to explain to the outside world. Food scarcity, the shortage of medicines and the lack of fuel is now hurting Nepalis all over Nepal but it does not fit the definition of ‘news’. So the stories take the predictable on-the-one-hand-this-and-the-other-hand-that approach.

By now, only the propagandists and the most gullible believe that the obstructions at the India-Nepal border are a result of the Madhesi agitation. India’s border SSB and officials at the Indian Oil Corporation have repeatedly let the cat out of the bag: “orders from above” not to let trucks and petroleum tankers to pass through. What is surprising is that the Indians expect us to believe it. Or maybe they don’t really care what we believe which, if true, is even more baffling. This will have an impact on Nepal’s stability long into the future by irreversibly polarising hills-plains relations, which in turn will have a bearing on Nepali-speaking India. It will make it doubly difficult to sell any joint river basin project to the Nepali public, and further alienate the Madhesis within Nepal.

The international community is watching aghast. Doesn’t New Delhi realise what this is doing, they ask.  Even Nepalis who have always been sympathetic towards India are bewildered. A long-term Indian resident of Kathmandu said to us the other day: “I have never been as ashamed to be an Indian.”

People here have long stopped buying the argument that this is about the constitution or the Madhesi cause, it is about India out to teach Nepal a lesson that we will not forget any time soon. It may work, or it may not. Either way, it will destroy what trust there was between the two countries. We can just look back at Sri Lanka and hope there is some memory of the price India and its leader paid for playing dirty there. If it is true that this is all about Bihar state elections, then it is even more bizarre.

We will not even try to enumerate the various international treaties that India has violated with the blockade. Enough just to say that it breaches just one code: the one of decency and good neighbourliness. Nepal passed a new constitution adhering to principles of democracy, trying to balance the demands of all interest groups while trying to protect national unity. Despite serious flaws, it is a document that for the first time takes a significant break from our feudal past. The points of disagreement (over demarcation of provinces, etc) can easily be rectified through amendments and the main parties in Kathmandu have publicly pledged to do so.

Nepal’s curse is that we rarely had the pragmatic statesmen we deserved, we never had leaders who lead by example. We either had populist chieftains, greedy demagogues or foolish adventurists. The current crop of leaders in the coalition is to blame for mishandling the constitution process and misreading Delhi. They broke it, so they must fix it.

India expects us to wave the white flag. Our leaders are waving the national flag. Neither is a way out.